Neither is defendants‘ conclusory statement within the notice of reduction that the expenses of injunctive relief would meet or exceed $75,000 enough.
See Honeycutt v. Dillard’s, Inc., 989 F. Supp. 1375, 1377 (D.Kan.1997). Defendants would not provide any facts that are underlying numbers or calculations supporting this declaration. The undersigned has maybe not considered this belated analysis that is“economic as it’s maybe maybe perhaps not into the treatment notice or submitted by means of *1201 attached affidavit thereto. 6 See Laughlin, 50 F.3d at 873; Martin, 251 F.3d at 1291 letter. 4; Coca-Cola Bottling of Emporia, Inc. v. Southern Beach Beverage Co., Inc., 198 F. Supp. 2d 1280, 1283 (D.Kan.2002) ( „Because jurisdiction is set during the time of the notice of treatment, the movant must satisfy its burden within the notice of reduction, maybe perhaps maybe not in some later on pleading.“).read more